Wow, thanks! Yeah, legible is what I shoot for. List I will have to look up.
And as usual, like and subscribe, lube the tuba, rattle the snakes, blare from the rooftops, put the smaller thing on top of the slightly larger thing and all what it is you youngsters do with your newfangled thingamajigs. The more the merrier.
Oh my gosh, your article is groundbreaking!!! You just summed up in legible terms the seismic shift of property rights that Big Tech is advocating through AI. I think it’s worthwhile to see IP protection through the analogous lens of economist Friedrich List.
Wow, thanks! Yeah, legible is what I shoot for. List I will have to look up.
And as usual, like and subscribe, lube the tuba, rattle the snakes, blare from the rooftops, put the smaller thing on top of the slightly larger thing and all what it is you youngsters do with your newfangled thingamajigs. The more the merrier.
For anyone short on time, specifically read:
Point #1 — AI Indemnity = New Property Regime, in which AI users are legal owners for work that they didn’t do.
Point #2 — succinct (& funny :) 1-line excuses from each Big Tech company
Point #3 — wholesaling of your data by Microsoft, Facebook, Google, Pintintest, Zoom (even your video calls!!), etc.
Point #4 — whatever you supply during “free trial” of their services WILL be used as training data.
Point #5 — But Big Tech makes sure that their own data will NOT be used for AI training. Their stuff stays proprietary - but not yours.
Oh my gosh, your article is groundbreaking!!! You just summed up in legible terms the seismic shift of property rights that Big Tech is advocating through AI. I think it’s worthwhile to see IP protection through the analogous lens of economist Friedrich List.